(PUB) Investing 2016
23
October 2016
Morningstar FundInvestor
Data through September 30, 2016 FINRA members: For internal or institutional use only. Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value A
Ticker HWMAX
Yield 0.1%
Total Assets $2,051 mil
Mstar Category Mid-Cap Value
Benchmark 1: Russell Mid Cap Value TR USD Benchmark 2: S&P 500 TR USD Morningstar Analyst Rating 08-01-16 ´
Investment Style Equity
Historical Profile Return Risk Rating Average High QQ Below Avg
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
15.0 20.0
Growth of $10,000
Investment Values of Fund Investment Values of Benchmark 1
Morningstar Pillars Process
10.0
∞ Positive ∞ Positive ∞ Positive ∞ Positive § Negative
Performance
5.0
People Parent
Performance Quartile (within Category)
* ) ) & & ) & & * ) ) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 09-16 29.67 20.37 11.49 17.79 23.80 21.70 28.31 40.17 40.60 30.90 33.30 16.34 -17.19 -43.16 56.03 34.04 -8.82 30.77 42.20 11.90 -12.75 7.77 -3.87 -15.76 -4.71 21.82 9.29 -7.44 12.26 8.75 -2.85 -7.97 -5.95 0.55 -22.68 -6.16 29.57 18.98 -10.94 14.76 9.82 -1.79 -14.13 -0.07 0.00 0.33 0.24 1.19 0.25 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.36 0.09 0.00 16.34 -17.52 -43.40 54.84 33.79 -8.82 30.47 41.91 11.53 -12.84 7.77 0.00 0.10 0.05 0.14 0.04 0.00 0.07 0.08 0.15 0.04 0.00 3.02 4.16 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.97 4.43 0.00 1.27 1.26 1.28 1.40 1.35 1.33 1.35 1.32 1.26 1.25 1.27 0.16 0.19 0.38 0.67 0.03 -0.06 0.28 0.32 0.29 0.10 0.48 41 99 90 3 1 92 2 8 26 94 79
Price
History
Morningstar Analyst Rating Morningstar evaluates mutual funds based on five key pillars, which its analysts believe lead to funds that are more likely to outperform over the long term on a risk-adjusted basis. Analyst Rating Spectrum Œ „ ´ ‰ Á
NAV
Total Return % +/- Bmark 1 +/- Bmark 2 Income Return % Capital Return % Capital Gains $ Expense Ratio % Income Ratio % Turnover Rate % Net Assets $mil Total Rtn % Rank Cat Income $
Pillar Spectrum ∞ Positive
§ Negative
¶ Neutral
Performance 09-30-16 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr
3rd Qtr
4th Qtr
Total
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
22.72 -3.30 4.62 5.33 30.77 17.31 5.33 8.15 6.42 42.20 5.35 5.39 -3.74 4.70 11.90 0.22 -1.92 -11.30 0.07 -12.75
55
45
51
85
67
62
72
66
55
54
42
1,183
628
242
244
255
175
224
662
756
406
313
Rating and Risk Time Period Load-Adj Return %
Portfolio Analysis 08-31-16 Total Stocks: 58 Share change since 07-31-16
1.23 -3.68 10.52
— —
Morningstar Rtn vs Cat
Morningstar Risk vs Cat
Morningstar Risk-Adj Rating
Sector
YTD Ret % % Assets — 4.74 -7.33 4.49 4.79 3.70 -4.35 3.47 31.59 3.47 -3.02 3.47 -12.65 3.29 -36.26 3.25 -0.49 3.14 — 2.75 4.31 2.70 — 2.69 -10.13 2.54 -7.42 2.33 -7.43 2.30 18.62 2.24 9.54 2.19 — 3.36 — 2.86 158.94 2.81
Trailing
Total Return%
+/- Bmark 1
+/- Bmark 2
%Rank Cat
Growth of $10,000
Y Popular Inc
Finan Svcs Technology Finan Svcs Finan Svcs Technology
1 Yr 3 Yr 5 Yr
2.18 1.99
3 Mo 6 Mo
10.52 6.07 6.67 6.46 -2.97 0.06 7.84 -9.42 -7.59 3.84 -6.65 -7.32 18.59 1.21 2.22 6.60 -1.29 -0.64
2 11,052 69 10,646 91 10,784 90 11,197 2 23,457 57 18,949 17 46,534
Y ARRIS International PLC Y Regions Financial Corp Y Citizens Financial Group
High Q
Low High -Avg
High QQQQ
17.32
1 Yr
High Q
10 Yr Incept
6.03 9.87
3 Yr Avg 5 Yr Avg 10 Yr Avg
Y Corning Inc
T NRG Energy Inc Y Kosmos Energy Ltd T Calpine Corp T Office Depot Inc
Utilities Energy Utilities
Other Measures
Standard Index
Best Fit Index
15 Yr Avg 10.79 0.07 3.64
Alpha
-8.3 1.18
-9.2 1.24
Cnsmr Cyc Cnsmr Cyc
Beta
Tax Analysis
Tax Adj Rtn% %Rank Cat Tax-Cost Rat %Rank Cat
Y Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co
R-Squared
69
79
3 Yr (estimated) 5 Yr (estimated) 10 Yr (estimated)
-0.09 15.86
94
2.04 1.24 1.17
50 42 51
Y Cairn Energy PLC
Energy Industrl Energy
9
Standard Deviation
15.37
Y Navistar International Co
4.79
77
Mean
3.84 0.31
Y Ophir Energy PLC
Sharpe Ratio
Y Willis Towers Watson PLC
Finan Svcs
Potential Capital Gain Exposure: -10% of assets
Y Royal Mail PLC
Industrl
Morningstar's Take by Katie Rushkewicz Reichart, CFA 08-01-16 Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value doesn't look good at every turn, but over time it can reward investors who hold on. Despite above-average fees, the fund's consistent investment process and stable and experienced team help it earn a Morningstar Analyst Rating of Bronze. Three managers have led the fund since its 1997 inception, and there's been little turnover on the broader investment team that contributes to all the firm's
Y Bed Bath & Beyond Inc T Whiting Petroleum Corp
Cnsmr Cyc
Energy
recover.Meanwhile,otherpickshaveweighedon results, including Office Depot ODP, whose merger was blocked. Adhering to the process, the managers added to the name when it was down. The fund's fondness for out-of-favor companies and sectors leads to boom-or-bust returns. It underperformed during the 2007-09 financial crisis and posted bottom- decile showings in 2011 and 2015. But when the market turns in its favor, it produces: the fund landed near the top of the category in 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013. With a process that leads to volatile returns, the fund is not for all investors. It won't help those who can't hang on during stretches of underperformance, as indicated by its poor dollar-weighted returns. Investors with a high risk tolerance can make out better: since inception, which encompasses two bear markets, the fund has topped the benchmark and the category.
Y CIT Group Inc
Finan Svcs Finan Svcs Technology
Y Brown & Brown Inc
Y CDW Corp
Current Investment Style
Sector Weightings h Cyclical r BasicMat t CnsmrCyc y FinanSvcs u Real Est j Sensitive i CommSrvs o Energy p Industrl a Technlgy k Defensive s CnsmrDef d Hlthcare f Utilities
% of Stocks
Rel Bmark 1
Market Cap % Giant 0.0 Large 14.9 Mid 59.4 Small 19.1 Micro 6.6 Avg $mil: 5,214
Value Blend Growth
Large Mid Small
45.84 0.94 0.00 0.00 17.65 1.64 27.21 1.66 0.98 0.06 45.48 1.43 0.00 0.00 17.07 1.63 8.69 0.80 19.72 2.24 8.67 0.44 1.65 0.47 0.20 0.04 6.82 0.60
offerings. The fund has long followed a contrarian, value- oriented process that, for better and worse, goes its own way rather than closely adhering to the Russell Mid Cap Value Index. The portfolio is indeed cheaper than the benchmarkon traditionalvaluationmetrics,suchasprice/ earnings and price/book. Sector weightings can vary greatly depending on opportunities. The fund gravitated to the beat-up energy sector in 2015 as oil prices slid. The sector overall has weighed on results during the trailing three years through June, a period when the fund landed in the bottom decile of the mid-value Morningstar Category. Despite the sector's rebound in 2016, the fund hasn't seen as big of a bounce, as some of its picks have been slower to
Value Measures
Rel Category
Price/Earnings 13.15
0.77 0.51 0.50 0.62 0.83 1.07 -0.14 -6.13 -5.65 -6.69
Price/Book Price/Sales
0.92 0.59
Price/Cash Flow 4.32 Dividend Yield % 1.99
Growth Measures
% Rel Category
Long-Term Erngs 9.62
Book Value
-0.25 -4.93
Composition - Net
Sales
Cash 1.0 Stocks 99.0 Bonds 0.0 Other 0.0 Foreign 20.8 (% of Stock)
Address:
Hotchkis & Wiley Funds
Minimum Purchase: Min Auto Inv Plan:
$2500 Add: $100 IRA: $1000
Cash Flow -15.46 Historical Erngs -21.54
Los Angeles CA 90017-5439
$2500 Add: $100
866-493-8637
Sales Fees:
5.25%L
Web Address:
www.hwcm.com
Management Fee:
0.75% mx./0.60% mn. Mgt:0.75% Dist:0.25%
Profitability
%
Inception:
01-02-01
Actual Fees:
Return on Equity Return on Assets
3.74 -0.87 2.27
Advisor:
Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Management LLC
Expense Projections: 3Yr:$907 5Yr:$1185 10Yr:$1978
Subadvisor:
None
Income Distribution:
Annually
Net Margin
A
ß ® Mutual Funds
©2016Morningstar, Inc.All rights reserved. The information herein is not represented orwarranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.Access updated reports at www.morningstar.com . To order reprints, email reprints@morningstar.com
Made with FlippingBook